A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Process 1 is the standard process used for several
years, and Process 2 is an updated process hoped to bring a decrease in assembly time. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the
company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 8 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at
random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in the
table below.
Worker
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Process 1
40
77
45
73
89
41
69
57
Process 2
28
73
56
46
70
58
46
44
Difference
12
-11
27
19
-17
23
13
(Process 1
Process 2)
Send data to calculator
Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly time for Process 1 exceeds that of Process 2? Answer
this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding uz (which is pu with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two
processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.
Perform a one-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as
specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

Transcribed: A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Process 1 is the standard process used for several
years, and Process 2 is an updated process hoped to bring a decrease in assembly time. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the
company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 8 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at
random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in the
table below.
Worker
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Process 1
40
77
45
73
89
41
69
57
Process 2
28
73
56
46
70
58
46
44
Difference
12
-11
27
19
-17
23
13
(Process 1
Process 2)
Send data to calculator
Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly time for Process 1 exceeds that of Process 2? Answer
this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding uz (which is pu with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two
processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.
Perform a one-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as
specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

Transcribed: (a) State the null hypothesis H, and the alternative hypothesis H1.
Ho :0
H :0
(b) Determine the type of test statistic to use.
Type of test statistic: (Choose one)
O=0
OSO
(c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to three or more decimal places.)
O
Math
Statistics
Continuous Probability Distribution
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Equality of Variances
Time Series Analyses, Forecasting Methods, and Indices
Multivariate Distributions and Functions of Random Variables
Basics of Inferential Statistics
Chi-squared Tests
Types of Data and Their Measurement
Frequency Statistics
Research Design Formulation
Markov Processes and Markov chain
Charts and Graphs for Data Visualization
Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds
Conditional Probability, Decision Trees, and Bayes' Theorem
Risk Estimation
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Centre, Spread, and Shape of a Distribution
Research Ethics
Fundamental Counting Principle
Non-parametric Tests
Other
Statistical Power and Errors
Survival Analysis and Life Tables
Simulation
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Sample space, Events, and Basic Rules of Probability
Statistical Quality Control
Anova and Design of Experiments
Discrete Probability Distributions
Data Collection, Sampling Methods, and Bias
Measures